A Case of Hypospadias with Double Channel Urethra

on passing a probe through this hole it was found to be quite a separate passage opening into the rnaiB urethra about 1A inches above the meatus, from whic^ it was separated by a thin septum. It appeared that the septum was united above with the roof of tk? urethra and did not allow the passage of urine through the meatus. On the previous day, it was the septic* which had offered resistance to the sound, and ba" been broken through. The urine was still com10? through the lower passage as the septum still acte like a valve to preventits flow through the other wayThe operation.?How to remove the septum waS.fe difficult problem. I thought of the spoke-shave ko1? for removal of the nasal septum, but it was not 1 stock. ^ The following simple device was therefore adopted:.-' A director was passed through the meatus with 1 groove towards the frenum, and a probe through * hole in the frenum. A cataract knife was then ,